#Openttd signals examples mod#

Exit signals are placed in front of the platform (assuming you're building a station) and behave like normal signals. I know that using tunnels or bridges would probably make this station exit work much better, but I'm a little constricted on space here, and this example is really just to help me figure out path signals. These should usually be two-way signals so trains will 'choose' green tracks over red ones. If I switched the last row of exit signals (the ones circled in yellow) to one-way path signals, would that improve the junction in the scenario described above? If so, do I need to make anything else into a path signal too, or just those three? Bugfix: Crash when having a Station Marker adjacent to the. MineMaarten Bugfix: Crash when having a Station Marker adjacent to the same rail.

#Openttd signals examples mod#

I THINK, as I have it set up now, a passenger train departing Track A will have to wait for a farm-product train a little ahead of it on Track B or Track C, even though the farm-product train wouldn't run over any rails that the passenger train needs to use. GitHub - MineMaarten/Signals: Minecraft mod that adds OpenTTD style signaling and more This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository. Passenger trains come in from the bottom, and turn right exiting the station to proceed along the line labeled 'Pax.' Farm-product trains also feed in from the bottom, and turn left to head out on the 'Fac' line. Am I doing it right with the exits for this station? I'm not quite sure when they actually ARE warranted, though. I've just picked up, from reading other threads, that overuse of path signals induces a heavy CPU load and is unnecessary. For the longest time I didn't realize you could make block signals and entry/exit signals one-way, so I put down one-way path signals everywhere, thinking they were the only ones that I could use to force trains to go one-way on my loops and ro-ros.